Rappers aren't rapping anymore. That's not the grumble of an old-school fan or knee-jerk disappointment upon hearing say the Kanye/Lil Wayne/Jay-Z/T.I track "Swagger Like Us" or the rap-less "Love Lockdown", it's just a fact. Most of radio's rappers are doing as much singing or club-ready chanting as rapping, and the few guys still rapping are layover from the late 90s/early 2000s or are named Lil Wayne and Kanye West-and the "talents" of those two are for some reason, still up to debate. Sure, there's plenty of rapping in the "underground"--which at this point, just means, not one of the like 12 artists that can still get rap radio support--and the so-called "hipster rap" trend/sub-genre offers some genuine rapping, but really, rappers just aren't rapping anymore and it's a bummer, but it also just makes sense.
The height of rap "lyricism" (a term that means nothing but everyone reading this knows its meaning) was during the early-to-mid-90s when hyper-poetic rappers like Wu-Tang and Nas and Biggie ruled the radio. Since then, every rapper's tried to occupy that same space and failed, not for a lack of talent, but because it's a pretty much perfect era that was able to function at a pretty high-level of visibility with a relative lack of corporate interruption...and then it ended. The death of Biggie and Tupac, Wu-Tang's dissolution, enter the era of Puffy--all the stuff you'll one day read about in a music textbook on the history of rap-- but most importantly (and word to Dart Adams) The Telecommunications Act of 1996.
Nas' story of never being able to truly top his classic Illmatic is also the story of every rapper to pick up a mic and get influenced by Nas or any of those 92-96 classics, constantly looking back to the shadow of that 90s era and never being able to top it. In the world of smart people books and stuff, it's considered "the anxiety of influence"; basically, the weird tension of wanting to respect and also transcend your influences takes on a kinda fucked-up father/son relationship.
Many of the trends of recent rap, stuff like, rhyming words with the same words, non-sequitur similes, contempt for metaphors, increasingly out-there pop culture references, a bounds-less sense of free association, and a tendency to mix and merge musical influences outside of hip-hop, are often cited for the "decline" of "lyricism" and that may be true, but it's also a bunch of artists finally, formally rejecting what I'll call, "the Nas formula".
And the word "formula" is used advisedly because at this point, it's nothing more than that. This is not about Nas' lyrical brilliance or lack thereof--many songs on the recent Untitled maintain Nas' energy and verbal brilliance--but about the way that like most things, it got reduced to a messy series of verbal signs, signifiers, and cliches that connote "lyrical" to an audience of both ignorant and well-informed rap fans. Wander into any college rap show or arrive really early for the first act of say, a GZA show and you'll see the "Nas formula" at-hand: Rap with lots of feigned passion, use some big words, eschew a lot of broads talk, vaguely invoke politics and you're there.
Kanye West and Lil Wayne are both post-lyrical, understanding and well-informed by 90s rap but increasingly disinterested in overtly having much to do with it. This is hard for older rap fans whose ears have been accustomed to the "Nas formula" to accept. The artistic choices, some of them strange and ill-advised, sound more like a lack of talent than an attempt to forge some new, interesting way to rap. Joke punchlines and wordplay puns stretched so far that the joke is just how far it was taken, hold as much clout as solid metaphors and to-the-point storytelling.
One of the roots of the post-lyrical phase is Dipset's "No Homo". The "No homo" line is as much about hyper-making sure you didn't say some gay stuff as it was about bending the meanings of phrases into every conceivable direction and finding something gay in even the most innocuous phrases. "No Homo" was a word game created by a bunch of rappers obsessed with word-games. There's a clear connection between "no homo" and something like Wayne saying "they cannot see me/Like Hitler". Kanye's a rapper that on College Dropout was pretty much rapping like it was 1992--the "De La Soul" formula if you will, something oddly enough, Pharrell pretty much lives by every time he raps--but has made a decision to fall into the weirdo word games and purposefully groan-inducing punchline goofiness of post-lyrical rap. These guys are painfully aware that the "Nas formula" cannot be improved upon and instead, take a little from it here and there but try to do something else. This is the same thing that has happened in the history of every art-form.
While the argument could be made that generally art does not "devolve", there's a sense in which an end-run is made around complexity or maxmalism because it's sort of come to a head. The history of 20th century art is a series of artists trying really weird and different stuff--"make it new" being the motto of Modernism--with less and less interest in tradition. How painting got from beautiful well-rendered landscapes, to weirdo scribbles and splatter on canvas has been well-documented, and it's sort of the same thing as rap's 90s era, a sort of peak of verbal complexity that inevitably had to be cut-down and fucked around with or completely drown.
The logical extension of the "Nas formula" is the Grad school wordplay jerk-off party of Anticon or El-P at his most verbose and didactic, which you know, worked fine as an alternative but simply couldn't and shouldn't function at anything resembling "popular" music, which Wu-Tang, Nas, etc really were for a few years ago (the falling-out in popularity of lyrical rap must also be in part, the fault of the artists who seemingly forgot how to make catchy hooks to accompany their lyric-driven verses).
Southern rap's infiltration has a lot to do with this too. As the Golden era gets a little further away, reconsideration and re-canonization has come along and part of that has been a fairly radical re-focusing of who and what influenced whom. The latest generation of rappers are younger than me and so, Jay-Z--who is a kind of of a different generation than Nas, Wu, etc.--is one of the benchmarks of lyricism. Wu Tang's post-Forever fall-out coincides with Ghostface's reinvention and there's kinda a generation more influenced by the weirdo, almost post-lyrical insanity of Ghost than Wu's hard-edged rhymes as a whole. Wayne and Kanye too, find as much to like in weirdo-rappers like Kool Keith and Grand Puba or even the garbled goofiness of Ma$e as do they those rappers' more stalwart peers.
28 comments:
Are you suggesting that De La Soul did not engage in "weirdo wordplay"?
You propose an interesting timeline. I can see the rise of Puffy and a lot of popular Southern rap in the late-90s as the birth of this post-lyrical era. But then where do superstars like Eminem and 50 fit? Are they the remnants of the Nas formula in the pop scene? Or can you consider them post-lyrical because their popularity may stem more from weirdo-rap singles (Em) and shock-value beef (50)?
Also, can you go more in-depth on the connection between this post-lyrical phase and the Telecommunication Act? I know the act led to more corporate consolidation of the music/radio business but I'm not getting the link between the two.
Great article, again.
So are the the not one 12 artists irrelevant then?
i don't really understand what the "De La" formula is. and how is Kanye's style in their same realm?
I think u messed the Wayne line up.
Like Hitler is supposed to connect to "Its the New Orleans Nightmare"
noz-
No. I'm not suggesting that.
Quan-
Well, the Telecommunications act prevented certain content from being seen/spoken of on MTV/radio etc and so, the money was no longer directed towards groups with said content.
Eminem is a kind of layover--obviously, I'm taking in generalities, plenty of lyric driven rap continued well into 2000s--and 50, well, I'd say he's post-lyrical.
Jordan-
No, they're very relevant, just not to the over-arching popular rap discussion I'm doing here.
Jesus-
I mean anything I say will upset somebody but in broad, basically stupid terms, playful but serious-minded rap that's part political, part personal, and self-depricating. Does that kinda work?
Marcus-
Huh? "They cannot see (NAZI) me/like Hitler" is the line there.
i see what you're saying, though i wonder in your mind, would wayne be counted as someone who derives from the de la world?
i remember noz writing some piece about ultramagnetic and how the South focuses more on cadence, but someone like wayne doesn't seem to be only interested in how he says things but what he says and making it as absurd as possible. would you like to suggest any other schools of rapping (although i realize that is very limiting)?
Jesus-
Yeah, I mean, no doubt Wayne's listening/listened to De La etc. I mention Kool Keith in relation to him. I have a piece from a while ago connecting Wayne to Grand Puba.
I mean, for the sake of making this post kinda brief, I called it the "Nas" school. All I meant by "De La school" is the Native Tongues etc cliches. I'd say though, maybe you could be like "Busy Bee school", "Rakim school", "De La school", "Nas school"...Jay-Z school? Not really sure.
To be honest, I planned this post to be a like BOMB and then I read comic books and jerked off for most of the day and wrote this. I plan to develop it further....
How do you explain rappers like Doom or Saul Williams? Doom is all over the place, non-sequitur and in some ways post lyrical rap, in many ways tied to the 'Nas formula' which I think explains his massive appeal to certain niche rap crowd that is often much derided and for what cause I am never sure of. Saul Williams just did an album in which he sang in it almost entirely and yet it lost very little of it's lyrical potency, for which is he is known and he claims be a direct descendant of the "Rakim formula'. I am just sayin there are some who have found a way to keep the 'Nas formula' relevant and still do post-lyrical rap, and some who just do post-lyrical rap and fiend lyrical ingenuity through that vehicle. The distinction between the two is important here.
Great post on DFW btw Brandon.
This is a really interesting post. Can we get a quick list of these approx. 12 big name rappers getting radio support that you're talking about? How many can we honestly call post-lyrical?
The radio I listened to as a kid was just plain pop radio and it was always very circumscribed "Me Against the World"/"Mo' Money Mo' Problems"/R&B centric fare that got play. I don't remember hearing much Wu-Tang/Mobb Deep/Nas, etc. on mainstream radio. So yeah, the recent Lollipop-Lockdown phenomenon is pushing it, but the rap I heard on the radio in the 90s was not all that far off from what I'm hearing now. Again, I'm not sure how much mainstream popular radio up here differs from your American "rap radio".
Awesome post. This needs to be put out there.
This is another can of worms, but I would be curious to read what you think about the musical side of the post-lyrical rappers. The beats behind them are just as dismissed as the lyrics. Examples being anything overtly-simple (the "A Milli" beat) or anything derisively classified as "ringtone rap" or "Casio rap" or Auto-tune and even the electronic-influenced stuff (like that Jeezy post you did a while ago, relating the music to experimental electronic music).
Where is Maino from?
I posed this question to my boy last night.
Homey, "he from ATl right?"
k - "He's from Brooklyn"
(incidentally, he's also 34. a year older than me, ie he should know exactly what hip hop from NYC should sound like)
Maino, much like Mims, has taken the NYC rapper transformed into a national sensation by rejecting everything that NYC historically stood for.
I.E, he's a 1% 50 Cent.
The Nas Formula, the Rakim formula, the formula that you needed to dominate NYC between 93-97 - is over.
But that didn't necessarily mean the end of lyricism.
Ras Kass notwithstanding, The best Mc from the "west" Pac's take on lyricism - focusing mostly on delivering content and feelings, as opposed to clever lines, witticisms, and esoterica - was still a viable form of lyricism in my mind.
Pac was about "truth telling".
Not to delve too much into black Americana and culture, but there's a long cultural history of truth telling. So when someone does it well, it really resonates. To the point that people also want to do it. In a lot of ways, Pac was "testifying" unlike the vast majority of rappers following the east coast formula.
And that style of rap has always resonated all over the country in hoods, burbs, and rural settings.
Clear, easily understandable, very repeatable ideas almost always beats out complicated wordplay.
With that in mind, TI (bun b, scarface, etc) is a huge proponent of a more conversational style of rap.
But consider his peer, Young Jeezy. Jeezy of course is as Pac as TI is, but Jeezy will deliver a line like, "my money talks like Charlie Sheen".
Jeezy intersperses his "cleverisms", but you wonder if he has a smirk on his face.
Weezy will do that as well, but at least some of the time, you know he does it for effect. A big part of his schtick is to over exaggerate rap cliche's.
Jeezy and Weezy do their version of a Nas formula, but they take liberties with it. At some level, they do think inclusion of wordplay is important.
Kanye(ezy) on the other hand, is richly steeped in what I would consider the straight ahead lyricism of the golden era. He remade 93 Til by souls. He references lots of old raps and old styles. He loves wordplay.
But the problem is first, that Kanye thinks he's dope with his word play.
And secondly, he has convinced a lot of people that he's dope.
But how?
The audience, in my view, is conflating 2 things
- good messages = good rapping.
You know the type of people i'm talking about. They hear an Obama reference, and suddenly the rapper gets put in the "good" pile.
Good rapping != to content you agree with.
- good messages means that bad similes are okay.
I.E, Yeezy can now get away with sin upon sin because folks who haven't been into rap for 20+ years don't know how to separate things.
"to be the shit and the urine"
Are you fucking kidding me?
Getting back to the topic -
The music world is post-hip hop.
Hip hop is post-rap.
Rap is now post-lyrical
But, if you ask ounger heads nowadays about lyrics, they'll never admit to being anti-lyrical.
They'll point out a sub-par rapper like Lupe Fiasco, who shouldn't even carry Phife's diabetes cookies.
It's as if 35 years of hip hop history never happened.
K-
Look for more on this topic with a tangent on Maino...the funny thing about Maino is, on a superficial level, he's pretty "real" and "New York". That beat's a fucking Jimmy Spicer break!
So basically, this is the classic defense of sucky pomo fiction/film/painting/whatever, applied to sucky pomo rap - i.e., it's bad because that's the point. I agree that we can never return to the boom bap era; shit, we can never go back to the shiny suit era, or even bring back the halcyon days of No Limit and Cash Money. This is why we all must pray that Cuban Linx II never comes out. But, just because these very specific styles are exhausted doesn't mean that lyricism has become outmoded. That would be like saying that, post Ulysses (or whatever line you want to draw in the sand), the days of traditionally good prose were over, or that, now that we have movies like Blue Velvet, Last Year At Marienbad, whatever, linear storytelling in film is a thing of the past. Yeah, the 19th century realist novel is dead, the 50s noir can't be brought back, but these broader paradigms and standards are still available for the artist to use and for the critic to judge work against. And I'd submit that lyricism, broadly defined, is an example of such a paradigm/standard. There has to be room for more than southern monosyllabic grunting and formalist word games. The "Nas formula" was nothing more than hyper-articulate commentary on the urban landscape, combined with insightful introspection. How can that ever go out of style? If it has, if all we're left with is corny punchlines that aren't even good - as you say, the joke is how (stupidly) far they're taken - surely that's not a good thing. And I'd remind you that the man who wrote The Anxiety Of Influence also wrote The Western Canon.
On Maino,
A Spicer break? I'll be damned.
I think this is a great topic, but real talk, I don't think a lot of the commenters get it.
Tray-
What's your point with the Bloom thing? It has nothing to do with postmodern bullshit or whatever you think I'm spewing. I guess Nas is a "strong" rapper and Maino is not.
k orr-
I'd agree most people don't seem to get it. But I sort of half-assed the entry too though.
so where does a group like camp lo fit in? nothing about what they said was personal, political, or even coherent. they were strictly concerned with style, in my mind. would they be the very beginnings of this post-lyrical era 10 years ago?
"And I'd submit that lyricism, broadly defined, is an example of such a paradigm/standard. There has to be room for more than southern monosyllabic grunting and formalist word games."
that sounds awfully like the discussion we had about "Stakes is High" last week in regards to jiggy rap.
Jesus-
Like all my posts, the idea is to getting people discussing, so I've done the job I intended but also,admittedly, I've not totally worked this whole thing out.
For me, there might be some connection to post-lyricism and Camp Lo, but my definition has never fallen on "style over substance" or anything (although again, I've not been totally clear). Same for MF Doom, as Jason mentioned, while these guys might be taking it in stranger and more associative directions, they still fall squarely within what I maybe deceptively called the "Nas formula". It's still fairly on-beat--or conventionally, enjoyable off-beat--and based on meter as much as cadence.
What I think Wayne, Kanye, and others is a little less concerned with all of those things.
Great post, kinda explained my love for everything 94-2000 and everything that i love now.
I think a key component to the piece was what is considered mainstream and what is now a niche. A lot of the current examples people gave for descendants of the "Nas Formula" (MF Doom, Saul Williams, etc) or those still in the game from that era (Ghostface, Wu, even Nas to some extent) aren't on a mainstream, sell a million albums level as the "post-lyrical artist".
The art world analogy is very apt. Where a picture of sea gulls, realistically rendered would have hung in the Louvre 400 years ago, today it's in your mom's kitchen; where as minimalist, abstract painting, sculptures, etc are all the rage.
Same in Hip Hop, artist like Little Brother, Doom, etc. dont get the major airplay but (thanks largely to the internet) are still able to find a niche audience (and large parts of that audience seem to connect with the music on a nostalgic level); where the likes of artist like Kanye, Weezy, Jeezy, T.I., even Soulja Boy take the art form in another direction and are the darlings (platinum sellers) of their time.
Lastly, there are exceptions to every rule. Hence y artist like Jay and Emimen (who follow religiously closely to the "Nas Formula") could drop an album tomorrow and sell a million albums. And why a group like Camp Lo, or even Goodie Mob could be kinda weirdo and still have an impact in the mid 90's.
Great piece.
saying camp lo is all about style is a mistake on my part. if we're using some of the ideas you put forth, it's pretty obvious that they're influenced by de la and, say, nice and smooth.
i am just unsure how unconcerned with previous techniques wayne is. by playing with meter and cadence, he totally cares about them. it's just his writing, to me, that feels like he's more concerned with the connections he can make between words.
GREAT writeup. I usually hate these types of discussions for obvious reasons you mentioned - its usually old school knee jerk reaction and unfair nostalgia. We've all heard similar types of argument has rear its head every generation. the gangsta era, the shiny suit era, the bling bling era - all of them, at one time or another, have been maligned as being inferior the glorious "good old days" But I hear you, and it is a discussion worth having.
And I hear you and Tray's discussion of postmodernism and irony and whatnot w/ regards to kanye and wayne, but if i may oversimplify the matter a bit- some people just enjoy being goofy. I personally unironically enjoy a lot of kanye and wayne's so called 'corny' one liners. For ex. I LOVE tht " you can not see me, like hitler" line - it is a brand of lyricism too isnt it?, its still playing around and having fun w/ the language. and you yourself wrote a totally great para on'No Homo'. "bending the meanings of phrases into every conceivable direction" that too is being lyrical, isnt it? oversaturation of tht style can be a problem too i agree, but I dont see how thts different from hearing 15 records filled w/ dense five percenter philosophy and slang. different strokes... yknow?
The art world analogy is very apt. Where a picture of sea gulls, realistically rendered would have hung in the Louvre 400 years ago, today it's in your mom's kitchen; where as minimalist, abstract painting, sculptures, etc are all the rage.
They were all the rage 30 years ago.... and now we're kinda back to more representative stuff, and weird video installations. But let's think about realism and rap for a second. In the late 80s, rap is largely bragging about the rapper - people like Rakim, Kane, early KRS, etc. Then with people like G Rap, Chuck D, Cube, you see a turn towards rapping about the rapper's hood, usually with an eye towards the crime and poverty that goes on there. By the mid-90s this is the dominant mode of rapping. Prodigy gives a very apt name for it - "reality rap." From great lyricists like Nas to awful ones like Group Home and even Master P, everyone was a reality rapper. Around this time Chuck D calls rap the ghetto CNN (back when CNN was still in the business of reporting news). The analogy's been argued to death, but the fact that it was even made tells you a lot about where rap was at the time. Today, rap's more like a ghetto lit mag. Everything's almost exclusively about the life and possessions of the rapper, and whatever isn't is branded as 'conscious' or retrograde, as if it requires some kind of social consciousness to talk about what's going on outside one's own head. Consider how little you ever hear Wayne talk about other people, or even any sort of recognizable physical space. Aside from a few references to Birdman and various nameless bitches, Wayne's work is entirely about what's in Wayne's head. Or take Jeezy. Whereas Master P, probably Jeezy's biggest influence, is always talking about fiends to the point where it gets kind of oppressive, whereas Rae told stories about suppliers and rival dealers, Jeezy presents drug dealing in an incredibly abstract way. His connects are alluded to, but never really talked about, his competitors never enter the picture, and the people whom he sells to are never even mentioned. It's just him alone with the white. Or finally, take Kanye. On the first album he places himself in a very social context - Kanye in the workplace, Kanye in the family, Kanye in Chicago - but by Graduation he'd become very insular. There's no sense of place or community on Graduation; with the exception of Homecoming (not coincidentally, the only song I can stand on the whole thing), the vibe is private plane travel. Now how can this be a good development?
tray-
Your observation is apt and true, but it's also just the reality of like for someone like Kanye. Your question of how this is a good development again, underlines your basic inability to like read something without getting all pissy. Not once did I suggest this change to be "good" (or bad).
HOWEVER...you also assume Kanye isn't aware of this change in his music, as if it's not a part of what Kanye's doing. When you are a superstar, travel the globe and are knee deep in pussy, you lose touch with your "community"...that's just how shit is. That's what 'Graduation' especially, is about.
" (the falling-out in popularity of lyrical rap must also be in part, the fault of the artists who seemingly forgot how to make catchy hooks to accompany their lyric-driven verses).
"
This sums up everything. If MF Doom could write a hook like "hi hater" he'd be huge.
Brandon,
My man Joey at Straight Bangin' put me onto your blog. Well-done...you've earned a spot on the roll. Strangely enough, I took a similar arc at the beginning of my newest blog. Check it out: manifestelan.blogspot.com
I've read both parts of this post several times and just let me say...this is some outstanding fuckin' writing, Brandon...but you knew that already.
One.
Exceptional post. Great stuff Brandon.
I linked you up by the way. Not really sure why I haven't spent a lot more time here in the past.
Dan
fromdabricks.com
freestyle fellowship was the first and best to do it, and were doing it (albeit in LA) around the age of illmatic.
Post a Comment