

A couple random pop music snapshots from the past few years: Timbaland beefing with the guy who used help him make beats on a lumpy victory lap kinda hit. Kanye parlaying soul-beat success into backpacker pop into icy auto-tune warble hits. Mariah Carey singing goofball lines about "bathing in windex" so clearly from the pen of the The-Dream.Though the ascent of producers and songwriters to all-out artists isn't anything new, this often awkward advancement dominates hip-hop and R & B in "the 'aughts". Timbaland. Kanye West. The-Dream. Ne-Yo. Keri Hilson. Even the explosion of DJ culture and the cult of Dilla and indie label careers of Alchemist or Black Milk owe to this trend gone a little crazy. It's the reason why a lot of music is so strange and form-stretching and it's why it's so weird and messy too. Sometimes, the radio sounds like the inmates are running the asylum. Because they kinda are.
The behind-the-scenes to the stage trend speaks to a bunch of shifts this decade, but namely the everybody's-a-star, post-reality show blah blah blah and the still confusing way that rap and R & B's increased mainstreaming runs parallel to it's idiosyncracies, porous borders, experimentation, etc. No doubt, this personalization of any and everything and the rarefication of a pop sound slam into one another in a ton of interesting ways, but like so many of the bizarro mergers and odd alliances of the decade, the "little guy", the actual weirdo, is pushed to the side. Not entirely pushed to the side and indeed, the internet and indie labels have adjusted expectations in some really cool ways, but well, there's a couple of interesting people that get to do everything and a lot of dudes that get lost in the mix.
For every, 808s & Heartbreak, there's a whole bunch of Mannie Fresh's Return of the Ballin' type records: Rolled out onto iTunes, eventually comes out on CD, and has no promotion. Something like 88 Keys' Death of Adam at one time, could've been "that weird record by the guy who produced "Thieves in the Night" but instead it was a three-years in-the-making, hyped-on-mixtapes, had a pre-mixtape-teaser-even record that was too weird and not poppy enough. There'd be more things like Cody Chesnutt's Headphone Masterpiece if the stakes were just a lower.
Yeah, this is dipped in nostalgia but there's something exciting about stuff like Eddie Hazel's Games, Dames, and Guitar Thangs or the records from Lee Hazlewood producer Billy Strange sitting in a bin of 25 Cent records. Or a Memphis Horns record. Or the Andrew Loog Oldham Orchestra. These one-off things a label conceded to putting-out or handed over some studio time for because hey, the people behind the hits deserved that much. Now, a label gives dudes a real budget, a P.R push, and facilitates some hit records which yeah, is surely preferable to the chance of making a weird, "personal" record but isn't so good for longevity or anything like that.
What stirred this all up though, is a few recent releases: Dam-Funk's Toeachizown, Ryan Leslie's Transition, and Mannie Fresh's Return of the Ballin, out now on iTunes, 11/17 physical). All three of these records are excellent and all of them give off the same feeling as some random-ass Billy Strange LP: A little too weird, a little too disinterested in catching a lot of listeners...jumbled, slabs of indulgence. And they gain their strength from this sensibility, they aren't weary listens and they don't fall back on the crutch of mega-popular artist's "experimental" album--there's something more being worked-out here.
You hear it in the all-over-the-place emotions of Ryan Leslie's new one--really, if you listen to the lyrics, the guy's a mess, obviously "a love addict" maybe a Co-Dependant--and you hear it in the underlying sadness of Fresh's "Like a Boss" or that coat of tinny vocoder on "Go Girl" and just pick up Dam's Toeachizown--it's over two hours of wash-over-you synth work. Steeped in the past but not aggressively "vintage" or anything, it's just Dam, free of the SOLAR Records studio or a Westside Connection sample-avoiding recording session. I could go on, highlighting a dozen more tiny details that make these records so fascinating, but the appeal here is how each of these will touch a listener totally differently; every song's a "hit" and none of them are. They're full of frayed edges and bubbling over with personality and shit just doesn't sound like this all that much anymore. Records that sound like the inside of the musician's mind.
This isn't to bemoan the current music landscape, though it's spitting out talents left and right all the time--like the economy, the free-market-ism hitting a critical mass to where only the super-successful have the right to do much of anything--it's just to point out that how music works right now (not enough pop stars, all the behind the scenes people want to and will get a chance to be pop stars and'll fail) doesn't allow for the kind of organic, slow-rolling weirdo creativity music behind-the-scenes-ers could once indulge in from time to time--and sometimes, they'd still make a hit.
further reading/viewing:
-"Rising: Dam-Funk" from Pitchfork-Al Shipley talking about the new Mariah
-Billy Strange Conducts Sinatra
-Richard Rorty on "the free market" from Take Care of Freedom...
5 comments:
Good post.
I honestly could not believe that the Mannie album had already been available on Itunes for like 5 days by the time I even HEARD about it. The idea of Mannie Fresh "quietly" releasing an album is just batshit insane when you think about some of the records he's been involved with. It would have been literally impossible for him to do such a thing before he left Cash Money.
Dam-Funk is dope, I like it a lot more than I expected to. I'd love to hear him produce some cuts for some electro-funk friendly MCs, such as E-40.
Actually, Dam-Funk's visual aesthetic reminds me a lot of the Mannie Fresh album cover, for some reason. Not that the two covers are remotely similar or anything, but they remind me of something you might find in a $1 CD or vinyl box that you buy just 'cause it looks cool, and it ends up being some dope ass electro DJ mix from '91 or some incredible early '80s funk that you'd never heard of. So cool.
mark-
Thanks man. And yeah, agreed on the Fresh album, what the hell. Fresh is an architect for so much of what's gone on in rap in the 2000s and it's not like he's some out of touch veteran, he still makes hits...yet his record rolls out like this.
I dismissed Dam-Funk for being schticky (Superfly hair, on Stone's Throw) and then I heard it and shit, it kills. Then I learned he played on a lot of SOLAR records shit and it just made sense.
Both covers are direct and simple and sincere. There's similar glow of the night to them too.
And yeah, you got exactly what I was going for with the 1 cd or record bin, etc.
Buying the mannie album now, also couldn't believe it was out. WTF
Dam-Funk is amazing. His live show is fucking super fun too... he just starts singing over records, be they his own or not...
And the Leslie album is pretty great though yes the lyrics are a mess. Having ridiculous lyrics is the best advertisement for your hot production though...
Even though it came out a bit ago, I feel like the DJ Quik / Kurupt album fits into this aesthetic of late aughts weirdo producer albums.
"I feel like the DJ Quik / Kurupt album fits into this aesthetic of late aughts weirdo producer albums."
Whoa, co-sign. Good point. The next question is...who is the most self-indulgent with their solo work?
Out of all these, I might argue Quik. He's all over the place with it (in a good way, sampling a Tivo'd foodnetwork show-- that's next level). Leslie, although seeming to be the most, I'd argue is the least because I mean...these lyrics- that's really putting yourself out there... "I'm really in to her...FASHION!" The Dream would be the opposite of Leslie in that sense...he's got "wacky" lyrics, but they aren't really revealing, they are often just dumb (I mean that in the best way possible).
Yup, I took it too far.
I love how the mannie fresh photo looks like a sega era menu screen (especially on the youtube video).
This post has an interesting internal logic kinda analogous to academic papers that conveniently substitute the naming of theories for an explanation of what they represent so that in compendium they build up to something else entirely. Every album/artist name dropped functions here like a different window on a train.
Hopefully I understood, but you're working out a distinction between the privelege under which something is allowed to flourish and what actually flourishes under that privilege, right? If so, it's a great point/distinction, that just because the little guy isn't the little guy doesn't mean the organism diversification going on in their recordings can't still hit anyone's nerves sideways.
At the same time, you concede that these examples of little guys who aren't exactly little shouldn't overshadow how their idiosyncracy also exists by way of rarefication, something obscured by the way innovative experimentation in sound seeps into everything right now tends to be presented as catch-all. Which is great, too, because in the defense of pop radio against essentialist notions of conditions for creativity it fucking sucks when you consider the constrained framework in which the experimentation is nonetheless flourishing.
The rorty quote's a good one. There's a Dewey piece I had to read for yesterday (which you've probably read) that has thing similar to Rorty's rebuke of hard knowledge as the primary social function for academia. Dewey talks (hyperbolizes) about art (lit/drama/poetry/etc.) as a process which engages as well as guages "emotion, perception, and appreciation" of the "outward happening," in turn expanding his prescription on how to fortify the intellect in order to deal with the world around you, as opposed to relying strictly on structural changes. But its also in the context of sharpening perception so that structural changes can be made successfully avoiding a tsar/bolshevik transference of hierarchy.
Similarly, there's a thing going on here about the difference between an actual artist and a product with test-marketed artist potentiality in the "blah blah blah" section, and how blah blah blah doesn't actually change the way an actual artist gets to shine market-wise, since actual artists end up on both sides of the fence.
The rorty quote's great because it also corresponds to the other thing i enjoyed about Dewey's piece, which is the way that it distanced itself from authoritative prescription of what system'll allow the flourishing, the means to and end vs. the end itself, something inevitably (and i think necessarily) undefined. So you've got indie labels, which don't automatically engender gold, and you have big labels, which don't automatically engender garbage. And then the indie labels aren't entirely indie, so dam-funk on stone's throw is still non-marginalized with a built-in audience that has potential for expansion. But the end point here is the opportunity, "take care of freedom..."
So, yeah, fun stuff, not hopeless or blindly pluralistic and not cocky about what's the right way either.
Post a Comment